The CEO of one in all Canada’s nationwide museums dedicated critical code of conduct breaches by yelling, mistreating employees and utilizing inappropriate language together with calling a senior management staff “sluts” publicly, the Workplace of the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner’s investigation discovered.
In a report revealed Wednesday, Commissioner Harriet Solloway discovered that Marie Chapman, who holds essentially the most senior job on the Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 in Halifax, engaged in a sample of behaviour over a decade that brought about emotional hurt to workers.
The report says some folks impacted reported considering self-harm.
“This was not a one-time lapse in judgment, however a repeated downside that endured for over a decade,” Solloway stated in a video assertion.
“This form of breach poses a critical risk to confidence within the integrity of the general public sector, and particularly the museum.”
The Harper authorities appointed Chapman in 2011 as the primary director of the museum. She was later reappointed by the Trudeau authorities in 2016, and once more in 2021 with a wage of as much as $221,700. One of many museum’s roles is to assist the general public perceive immigrants’ experiences arriving and settling in Canada.
Chapman instructed the commissioner she disagrees with the findings of her report and wrote that “given the gravity of the state of affairs,” she ought to revisit the case.
After a two-year investigation that concerned interviewing 19 witnesses, virtually one-third of the museum’s workers and Chapman, the report discovered a few of the director’s actions may “fairly be characterised” as bullying.
Some workers instructed investigators they had been “terrified,” had panic assaults and feared talking up as a result of Chapman stated everyone seems to be replaceable.
The report additionally claims Chapman ranked ladies working on the museum by age, stated there are “no handsome males” on the museum and referred to some employees by pseudonyms about how they seemed or acted which led to “hurtful nicknames.”
Chapman referred to a senior management staff, or SLT for brief, utilizing the time period “sluts” together with in public and in entrance of museum employees, the report stated. She instructed a delegation from one other nation “I name them sluts” whereas laughing about it, the investigation discovered.
“Whereas some witnesses recounted that Ms. Chapman was attempting to be humorous, the usage of such language within the office is inappropriate and inconsistent with the requirements anticipated of somebody in a management place within the federal public sector,” the report stated.
Chapman additionally stated {that a} well-known feminine athlete “appears like a person” and was too masculine to be featured in a museum product whereas making a disgusted facial features, Solloway’s report stated.
“Suggesting {that a} girl doesn’t have the precise look to have the ability to be consultant of girls is offensive, and it’s much more problematic coming from a chief govt like Ms. Chapman,” Solloway’s report stated.
Report says workers feared talking out
The commissioner’s workplace launched its investigation into Chapman’s conduct in 2023 after receiving details about a number of alleged incidents.
Since 2012, Chapman raised her voice whereas indignant greater than as soon as, the report stated.
In a single occasion, an worker was so afraid they took the following day without work after Chapman threw a stack of union playing cards at them and claimed they used the museum’s gear to make them, the report stated.
The investigation’s report concluded that Chapman wasn’t skilled and immediately violated the federal authorities’s values when she used her energy to “strike worry into workers” and goal folks.
“The state of affairs was notably troubling, on condition that Ms. Chapman occupied essentially the most senior place on the museum, and lots of workers had been reluctant to lift issues, for worry of detrimental penalties,” the report stated.
The report discovered that Chapman breached the federal authorities’s values and ethics code together with the museum’s code of conduct.
As a governor-in-council appointee, Canadians anticipate folks able like this to “behave in a fashion that may bear the closest of public scrutiny,” the report stated.
Her behaviour “was not trivial, however a repeated demonstration of poor judgment,” investigators discovered.
Solloway beneficial corrective measures to Chapman and that an exterior professional assess workers’ wellness to search out applicable help measures for them.
Chapman issued a prolonged response to the commissioner’s workplace refuting most of the allegations and “acknowledged” the advice.
“Whereas I disagree with the findings outlined within the case report, I acknowledge and embrace my duty as a pacesetter of the museum,” Chapman wrote in her response.
“I welcome alternatives for studying and enchancment and I stay up for partaking an exterior professional to information us within the course of.”
The commissioner wrote that response “fell brief” and is “not passable.”
Chapman wrote she needs the report back to be modified to incorporate particular dates and numbers as a result of it creates a “misunderstanding of the frequency and scale of those occasions.”
“At no level have I threatened anybody’s employment or fostered a local weather of worry,” she wrote.
Chapman additionally raised questions in regards to the impartiality, objectivity and equity of the report. She stated just one former museum board member was interviewed, and a extra various vary of witnesses together with key board members ought to have been included.
She admitted that she used the phrase “sluts,” however stated she was by no means requested by investigators to make clear what she stated.
“I referred to the senior management staff as ‘sluts,’ nevertheless it was not directed particularly at ‘MY senior management staff’ as cited,” Chapman wrote.
“This distinction is vital as a result of I all the time thought-about myself a part of the group.”
Chapman stated that some folks instructed investigators her remark was made “in solidarity, not meant to disrespect our staff.”
She stated that claims involving elevating her voice and throwing a stack of playing cards seek advice from occasions that occurred between 2012 and 2015, and have since been formally addressed and contested.
In response to the declare she stated a well-known athlete seemed too manly, Chapman stated she did not intend any hurt and talked about how together with extra ladies within the “museum’s movie’s sports activities part may discourage feedback about [redacted].”
She stated her remark about “no handsome males” refers to an interplay at an occasion earlier than her appointment as CEO.
CBC Information requested Chapman for touch upon Wednesday evening and has not acquired a response but.
The Prime Minister’s Workplace additionally has but to reply to questions on Chapman’s future.
Have a narrative or information tip associated to this story? Confidentially electronic mail ashley.burke@cbc.ca.
For those who or somebody is struggling, this is the place to search for assist:
Keep forward of the curve with NextBusiness 24. Discover extra tales, subscribe to our e-newsletter, and be a part of our rising neighborhood at nextbusiness24.com
